<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>Feed Informer: Forums &#187; Topic: updates are two weeks old</title>
		<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764</link>
		<description>Feed Informer: Forums &#187; Topic: updates are two weeks old</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 09:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.2</generator>
				<atom:link href="https://feed.informer.com/forums/rss.php?topic=764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>alohaliving on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2740</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alohaliving</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2740@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>things look great!  I appreciate your time.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>admin on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2725</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2725@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We have sorted out the problem with updates. If there are any troubles please let us know.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>alohaliving on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2720</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alohaliving</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2720@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response and attention.</p>
<p>1.  updated in the last two weeks.<br />
Yes, I checked the source of the digests and there are 1-2 daily updates.  However, when trying to view the source directly, I notice that it takes an unusually long time (approx 30 seconds) to actually see the content of the source in my browser.  Would something like this be causing the delay?</p>
<p>2.  no custom filters.<br />
That is correct.  There are no custom filters on this digest.  We want everything in the source to show up.</p>
<p>I really appreciate your time.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>admin on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2718</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2718@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>alohaliving,<br />
if the web page containing your digest is requested at least few times every hour the digest should receive updates on hourly basis.<br />
As I mentioned here many times before, we cannot pull out feeds more often because we might get banned by source websites for excessive load. Unfortunately, every website administrator has their own idea of "excessive", that's why we ought to ask our users to provide us with digest's IDs, so we could check if it's not the case.<br />
So, if you're sure that 1) source feeds are updated within last two weeks and 2) you're not using custom filters in your digest's settings preventing them from mixing into the digest, the ball is in our court.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>alohaliving on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2717</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alohaliving</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2717@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response. </p>
<p>My site gets about 21,000 page views per day.  Is that popular enough?  I'm honestly not sure.<br />
I noticed that now the digest seems to be one week behind instead of two.   A great improvement, but obviously not optimal.  Can you shed some light on some possible causes and/or solutions?</p>
<p>Thanks again.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>admin on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2683</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2683@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The digests have been updated.</p>
<p>Please also keep in mind that update of a digest happens only if it's requested often enough, which is, of course, irrelevant if your site is popular.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>alohaliving on "updates are two weeks old"</title>
			<link>https://feed.informer.com/forums/topic.php?id=764#post-2672</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alohaliving</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2672@https://feed.informer.com/forums/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>9CXM9YPMLN<br />
and<br />
AYVDTW7NY9</p>
<p>please see the test page here: (test page uses 9CXM9YPMLN)<br />
<a href="http://www.webwraps.com/gmaptest.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.webwraps.com/gmaptest.html</a></p>
<p>as you can see, the most recent update of the source was on April 4 but the most recent update on the sample above is March 20.  the same problem is true for AYVDTW7NY9</p>
<p>thanks
</p>]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
